<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Kimbell Sherman Ellis, LLP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ksefocus.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ksefocus.com</link>
	<description>Government Affairs and Strategic Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:30:10 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A Different Take on the Supreme Court Ruling by Charlie Merriman</title>
		<link>http://www.ksefocus.com/citizens/comment-page-1#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie Merriman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksefocus.com/?p=1759#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Great piece, Kevin.  I still maintain the decision was a poor legal decision on the grounds that the provisions struck down (prohibition on using general treasury funds from corps and unions to fund political speech, 30 day moritorium on distribution of &quot;electioneering communications&quot; prior to primary) do not violate the 1st Amendment -- but that is not the point of your blog, is it?

Your point is that we shouldn&#039;t judge a decision (there&#039;s a nice twist) based on what we anticipate will be the effect of the decision.  Court decisions, like policy positions, must be judged on their merits.  That is a great, apolitical point with which I fully agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great piece, Kevin.  I still maintain the decision was a poor legal decision on the grounds that the provisions struck down (prohibition on using general treasury funds from corps and unions to fund political speech, 30 day moritorium on distribution of &#8220;electioneering communications&#8221; prior to primary) do not violate the 1st Amendment &#8212; but that is not the point of your blog, is it?</p>
<p>Your point is that we shouldn&#8217;t judge a decision (there&#8217;s a nice twist) based on what we anticipate will be the effect of the decision.  Court decisions, like policy positions, must be judged on their merits.  That is a great, apolitical point with which I fully agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Second Education by Entirtysmiste</title>
		<link>http://www.ksefocus.com/the-second-education/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Entirtysmiste</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 07:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksefocus.com/?p=1472#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Cool blogpost, I didn&#039;t thought this would be so cool when I saw the link!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool blogpost, I didn&#8217;t thought this would be so cool when I saw the link!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Steve Kimbell Interviewed RE: Tom Salmon&#8217;s Apology by Tweets that mention Steve Kimbell Interviewed RE: Tom Salmon’s Apology &#124; Kimbell Sherman Ellis, LLP -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ksefocus.com/kimbellnew/comment-page-1#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Steve Kimbell Interviewed RE: Tom Salmon’s Apology &#124; Kimbell Sherman Ellis, LLP -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksefocus.com/?p=1466#comment-9</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shay Totten, KSE. KSE said: New blog post: Steve Kimbell Interviewed RE: Tom Salmon&#039;s Apology http://www.ksefocus.com/kimbellnew [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Shay Totten, KSE. KSE said: New blog post: Steve Kimbell Interviewed RE: Tom Salmon&#39;s Apology <a href="http://www.ksefocus.com/kimbellnew" rel="nofollow">http://www.ksefocus.com/kimbellnew</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dubie Wins! by Tom Edison</title>
		<link>http://www.ksefocus.com/dubie-wins/comment-page-1#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Edison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksefocus.com/?p=1439#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Bartlett was at the parade with Dubie. 
wkp&#039;s comments make sense. 
The main difference between the Dems is style &amp; substance. Assuming the Dems run a primary that refrains from the negative, the winner comes out of the primary with 40% of the vote from people who will not support a Republican under any circumstances.
Look for the Dem who speaks to the people about the issues important to them, is moderate and demonstrates knowledge and substance and you will find the next governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bartlett was at the parade with Dubie.<br />
wkp&#8217;s comments make sense.<br />
The main difference between the Dems is style &amp; substance. Assuming the Dems run a primary that refrains from the negative, the winner comes out of the primary with 40% of the vote from people who will not support a Republican under any circumstances.<br />
Look for the Dem who speaks to the people about the issues important to them, is moderate and demonstrates knowledge and substance and you will find the next governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dubie Wins! by wkp</title>
		<link>http://www.ksefocus.com/dubie-wins/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>wkp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 16:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksefocus.com/?p=1439#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Just for argument&#039;s sake: In most elections, the past is not prologue. Forget the trials, tribulations and vote tallies for the Dems&#039; primary; one of them will get the nomination and thus in Vermont can be assured of starting the general election campaign with a numerical advantage, assuming Pollina falls into a hole, which seems likely. Dubie, whatever his hidden strengths, is no Douglas and, since this is a non-presidential election year, it is highly unlikely that the overall turnout will be as high as it was in 2008.  Thus if only die-hard Dems and die-hard GOPers vote, then the Democrat wins because the liberals simply out-number the others in this state. Toss in a modest number of new voters (young) and a ho-hum turnout of true independents, then the election could turn on who runs the best campaign. At least a couple of the Democrats may be able to perform considering that out-campaigning Dubie should be relatively easy at least among tuned-in voters. Then factor in a surprise, quick visit from Prince Obama, aided and abetted by quiet but effective use of the Leahy crowd and also take notice of the high likely that Dubie will shoot himself in the foot at least once and can&#039;t expect much help from anyone. So, here&#039;s the bottom line: I&#039;ll bet you a breakfast that Dubie is not our next governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for argument&#8217;s sake: In most elections, the past is not prologue. Forget the trials, tribulations and vote tallies for the Dems&#8217; primary; one of them will get the nomination and thus in Vermont can be assured of starting the general election campaign with a numerical advantage, assuming Pollina falls into a hole, which seems likely. Dubie, whatever his hidden strengths, is no Douglas and, since this is a non-presidential election year, it is highly unlikely that the overall turnout will be as high as it was in 2008.  Thus if only die-hard Dems and die-hard GOPers vote, then the Democrat wins because the liberals simply out-number the others in this state. Toss in a modest number of new voters (young) and a ho-hum turnout of true independents, then the election could turn on who runs the best campaign. At least a couple of the Democrats may be able to perform considering that out-campaigning Dubie should be relatively easy at least among tuned-in voters. Then factor in a surprise, quick visit from Prince Obama, aided and abetted by quiet but effective use of the Leahy crowd and also take notice of the high likely that Dubie will shoot himself in the foot at least once and can&#8217;t expect much help from anyone. So, here&#8217;s the bottom line: I&#8217;ll bet you a breakfast that Dubie is not our next governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dubie Wins! by Harold L. Bailey II, 104 Eden St. Hyde Park, Vt. 05655</title>
		<link>http://www.ksefocus.com/dubie-wins/comment-page-1#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold L. Bailey II, 104 Eden St. Hyde Park, Vt. 05655</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksefocus.com/?p=1439#comment-5</guid>
		<description>This makes it sound like a shoe in, but I know we have to work for Brian in order to be sure that he is our next Governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes it sound like a shoe in, but I know we have to work for Brian in order to be sure that he is our next Governor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dubie Wins! by Samuel Young</title>
		<link>http://www.ksefocus.com/dubie-wins/comment-page-1#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 00:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ksefocus.com/?p=1439#comment-4</guid>
		<description>What do you think the odds are of a bill passing the legislature next year moving up the date of the primary election?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think the odds are of a bill passing the legislature next year moving up the date of the primary election?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
